If they are fixed in 3.x, it'd be good to just close them out. Ideally, point them at the issue that resolves them though as superceded / duplicate. Folks will keep coming across them at a later date searching for something in the 2.x line.
- Brett On 28/12/2009, at 8:11 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Is anyone planning on actually doing any bug fixing in the 2.x artifact > resolution code? > > Lots of this stuff has been fixed in 3.x and I was just going to push any > bugs I saw in JIRA to 3.x and validate as fixed and for the ones that aren't > schedule them to be fixed. > > I don't think at this point anyone really wants to muck around in the 2.x > codebase, but if someone wants to then I will leave the issues alone in JIRA. > > Thanks, > > Jason > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Jason van Zyl > Founder, Apache Maven > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > -- Brett Porter [email protected] http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
