Then anything I see I will just move to 3.x because I honestly don't think anyone is going to fix them in 2.x and the code is too different now to backport any of it.
On 2009-12-28, at 8:13 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > If they are fixed in 3.x, it'd be good to just close them out. Ideally, point > them at the issue that resolves them though as superceded / duplicate. Folks > will keep coming across them at a later date searching for something in the > 2.x line. > > - Brett > > On 28/12/2009, at 8:11 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > >> Is anyone planning on actually doing any bug fixing in the 2.x artifact >> resolution code? >> >> Lots of this stuff has been fixed in 3.x and I was just going to push any >> bugs I saw in JIRA to 3.x and validate as fixed and for the ones that aren't >> schedule them to be fixed. >> >> I don't think at this point anyone really wants to muck around in the 2.x >> codebase, but if someone wants to then I will leave the issues alone in JIRA. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jason >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> Jason van Zyl >> Founder, Apache Maven >> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > -- > Brett Porter > [email protected] > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > Thanks, Jason ---------------------------------------------------------- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven http://twitter.com/jvanzyl ---------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
