Oups, this sentence was used during SNAPSHOT developement and should have
been removed before release

Need some doc cleanup :)

2010/1/11 Henri Gomez <henri.go...@gmail.com>

> Thanks Nicolas :)
>
> I was not sure since I read the sentence :
>
> "version 1.2 includes a preview of gwt 2.0 support"
>
> Also :
>
>  mvn archetype:generate \
>   -DarchetypeGroupId=org.codehaus.mojo \
>   -DarchetypeArtifactId=gwt-maven-plugin \
>   -DarchetypeVersion=1.1 \
>   -DgroupId=myGroupId \
>   -DartifactId=myArtifactId
>
> but archetype version 1.2 is available.
>
> In the doc reference to the gwt-maven-plugin are still to 1.1.
>
>
>
> 2010/1/11 nicolas de loof <nicolas.del...@gmail.com>:
> > This doc is up-to-date.
> >
> > the 1.2 version is not dedicated to gwt 2.0, it just support this version
> as
> > GWT >= 1.4
> >
> > 2010/1/11 Henri Gomez <henri.go...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> Hi to all,
> >>
> >> I'll do some GWT 2.0.x application and get a look at
> >>
> >> http://mojo.codehaus.org/gwt-maven-plugin/
> >>
> >> The documentation is still mainly for plugin 1.1 (gwt 1.7.x) with some
> >> notice for gwt 2.0 support.
> >>
> >> Did there is an up to date documentation available somewhere for best
> >> practices with gwt-maven-plugin 1.2 released in late December.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to