I agree. Perhaps for some of them we could discuss to move them to mojo.codehaus.org to let the community take the lead on them if we find some volunteers (I'm thinking about the eclipse plugin for example).
Arnaud On Nov 1, 2010, at 1:37 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Following up from a discussion on the user list. I think it's time to be > realistic about providing a healthy level of support for plugins here. I > think it makes more sense to reduce the foot print of plugins we say we > support and do those well as opposed to housing many plugin that just don't > get much love. I would ask people to think about the plugins we're housing > that we shouldn't. Probably a thread per plugin would be fine for discussion. > > To that end the plugins I'll send the first thread. > > Thanks, > > Jason > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Jason van Zyl > Founder, Apache Maven > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Our achievements speak for themselves. What we have to keep track > of are our failures, discouragements and doubts. We tend to forget > the past difficulties, the many false starts, and the painful > groping. We see our past achievements as the end result of a > clean forward thrust, and our present difficulties as > signs of decline and decay. > > -- Eric Hoffer, Reflections on the Human Condition > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
