Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On Nov 1, 2010, at 3:04 PM, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > >> For the eclipse plugin, I think that just moving it to retired isn't a >> good think because even if we are agree that this one is now really >> difficult to maintain, this is always the preferred integration way with >> eclipse in many corporate environments. > > I think once it's retired anyone has the option to pick it up and maintain > it. I think all we're saying putting it in the retired area is that we > don't have the resources to support said plugin. Folks can do what they > like after that.
Why don't you move it then straight away over to mojo ? - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
