On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Barrie Treloar <baerr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> > wrote: > > +1 on keeping the eclipse plugin. I like m2Eclipse but at times is > > buggy so I fall back to using this often. > > As someone who irregularly maintains m-e-p I have the same issues as above. > I've got m2eclipse working at home but I've never been able to get it > to work in my corporate environment yet. > (I've never looked at Eclipse/STS) > > m-e-p mostly works. A lot of the problems are around the edge cases. > And there are a lot of missing integration tests for the IBM specific > tools. > +1 But I'm forced to admit that maven eclipse plugin doesn't bring any solution either. > > Maybe giving it a new home would help, I haven't thought about it enough. > I've not looked at git usage at all, and from the little I understand > someone still needs to maintain it so that it can be released and > synced (via forge to central, or however). > I dont think a move will help the maintenance question, but it may > remove the (mis)percpetion that it is more actively maintained. > > I'd be interested to see other peoples opinions > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
