Nah, i'll just release it again.

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Rex Hoffman <r...@e-hoffman.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Rex Hoffman <r...@e-hoffman.org> wrote:
>
>> Seems reasonable, build a helper library to run clirr and analyze it's
>> results, allow the clirr plugin to use it in it's existing manner, or by an
>> enforcer rule.
>>
>> That fact that it's clirr under the hood of that enforcer rule will be
>> completely abstracted.  This will be a rule to enforce apache version
>> standard, that happens to use clirr.  I'll write a clean api for it's
>> analysis provider (clirr).
>>
>> I know it'll be annoying, that's kinda the point.  If your working on a
>> 1.1-SNAPSHOT and create a backwards breaking change, you have messed up.
>>  The rule will tell the dev to correct the method, or bump the version
>> number to 2.0-SNAPSHOT.  The real danger is a dev not being aware that they
>> have produced a backwards breaking change.  Again, very helpful for apis.
>>
>> Given Brett's email today citing the desire for
>>
>> "
>> Configurable conflict resolution strategy - newest, oldest that satisfies
>> Enforcer rule to lock down above
>> Importance of specificity, not magic - break the build if conflicting
>> versions, not try and solve it
>> Be deterministic is maven's strength
>> "
>>
>> I think it's important we codify how maven wants devs to think about
>> versions.  Right now it a snapshot or release.  The ranges have vague
>> meaning at best, not knowing what version policy the project you depend on
>> follows.
>>
>>
> "Hold off on the release" that is....  only one typo in this message, I can
> live with that....
>
>
>> If you want to hold of the release until Monday, I will commit to having it
>> done and tested by then??
>>
>> I think having the dependency-convergence rule and this rule will do a lot
>> for many organization that have or are adopting maven.  I know it definitely
>> helped at the last place I worked.
>>
>> Rex
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Brian Fox <bri...@infinity.nu> wrote:
>>
>>> > If I were to clean this up and construct an enforcer rule that
>>> > demanded adherence to the letter of the law of the apache version
>>> > standard, is something that would be allowed into the maven enforcer
>>> > plugin?
>>> >
>>>
>>> Given a proper rule with tests, I would unlikely reject it out of hand.
>>>
>>> > Or would the team prefer I continue to try to work the the clirr-mojo?
>>> >
>>>
>>> My gut though is that this might be better as a report than a rule. I
>>> think an enforcer rule could get in the way of developers if as soon
>>> as they made a breaking change, the build blew up on them. It would
>>> make a bit more sense in a release profile but even there blowing up a
>>> build is annoying.
>>>
>>> What belongs in the enforcer vs other plugins is definitely a grey
>>> area that has no great answer. Certainly I could make a rule to
>>> duplicate checkstyle and pmd checks, but those plugins have ways of
>>> failing the build already. The enforcer wasn't intended to become the
>>> central place for all things that fail a build, although it could.
>>>
>>> Given that there seems to be great overlap with the clirr stuff in
>>> checking the api, it feels like the functionality should be there.
>>> However, if you construct it as a separate plexus component, then both
>>> clirr and the enforcer could use that shared code to provide multiple
>>> ways to attack it.
>>>
>>> > Give me a firm commitment (contingent on quality of course ) and I
>>> > could have this done tonight.
>>> >
>>> > Rex
>>> >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rex
>> (415) 273-9438
>> http://www.e-hoffman.org
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to