On 9 November 2010 16:30, Rex Hoffman <r...@e-hoffman.org> wrote: > My thoughts exactly on the annotation ie. hosted in a generic context. The > concern I have is the number of useful open source projects that expose > interfaces that clients are not required to implement. Ultimately since > this style of checking is primarily used by the devs of the project, I can > have them define the annotation, and whether it marks an interface as > "client implements", or "client does not implement". Those might not be the > best names for the annotation, as it really would mean 'Client implements it > and my code will break binary compatibility, by calling it at runtime".
Note that Eclipse's PDE has Javadoc tags for these notions: http://help.eclipse.org/helios/index.jsp?topic=/org.eclipse.pde.doc.user/reference/api-tooling/api_javadoc_tags.htm Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
