I tried to deploy the whole enforcer project (so I suppose the vote
topic was incorrect). I did stage-deploy of the whole enforcer project,
but if you're looking at what files I managed
to upload yesterday, you'll probably see a number of different attempts.
I'll try tonight with 2.3 and restart vote (with proper topic) if it works.
Kristian
Den 16.06.2011 11:36, skrev Lukas Theussl:
Somewhat confused now: is this vote for the enforcer-plugin alone? Ie
did you only stage-deploy the plugin site or the whole enforcer site?
(I suppose this needs to be released and voted on as well?)
The plugin site uses relative links in the menu that lead out of the
current project, so these links will get broken if different modules
get stage-deployed to different locations, as seems to be the case here.
My guess is that using site-plugin-2.3 should fix the problem (and
stage-deploy of a multi-module project is a real pain with 2.2
anyway...), but in any case you need to stage-deploy the whole
enforcer site if the relative links should work.
HTH,
-Lukas
Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
Well yes, it's there, but the left-hand menu items point to the current
production version instead of the newly staged versions.
This seems to be because the xref between the plugin (with a specific
url) and the remaining enforcere modules
(with a different url) does not work when staging. If I stage locally
and just copy everything manually to a single folder
it works. This looks like it'll work if I did the production release,
but the cross reference links in site.xml uses relative
adressing to link from the plugin to the enforcer rules.
I'm a bit at loss at what is the correct way to fix it.
Kristian
Den 16.06.2011 11:17, skrev Lukas Theussl:
Isn't the correct staging site here:?
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-enforcer-plugin-1.0.1/
It got deployed by you yesterday...
HTH,
-Lukas
Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
There is something weird with the multi-module site in enforcer. I
don't have the time
to debug this one at the moment so I'm cancelling the enforcer vote
instead of keeping you all in suspense.
Kristian
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Karl Heinz
Marbaise<khmarba...@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi,
Also the "Custom Rules" -> "Writing a custom rule" produces the
same...
after waiting a full day nothing changed...which means the missing
pages
are there...
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
--
SoftwareEntwicklung Beratung Schulung Tel.: +49 (0) 2405 / 415 893
Dipl.Ing.(FH) Karl Heinz Marbaise ICQ#: 135949029
Hauptstrasse 177 USt.IdNr: DE191347579
52146 Würselen http://www.soebes.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
