Anyone who is actually going to do the work can make a branch when they need to. I see no point in making a branch just for fun.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote: >> As for the solution of creating a 2.x branch, that's fine. I don't >> really see much difference between your solution and mine, given that >> you basically admit that not much work will be performed on it. Kill >> it outright, or let it bit rot, either way.. Let's just move forward >> with Maven 3.x and Java 1.6.x. > > I'd rather focus on our agreement than our disagreement. Some complex > ball-o-hair that avoids a branch is worse than a branch. > > The net effect is that anyone with an itch to maintain the 2.x branch > can maintain the 2.x branch. > > Note that Mark S has strong feelings that the necessary wiring to > Aether should be carefully contained in the maven component that plugs > in Aether, rather than having Aether calls directly in something like > the m-d-p. > > I'm willing to go make the branch so that anyone who is raring to go > work on the trunk is unimpeded. > > Anyone think we need a vote? > > > >> >> -Jesse >> >> -- >> There are 10 types of people in this world, those >> that can read binary and those that can not. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
