I think doing RCs like we have done in the past for all other 3.x releases might be a good idea.
On Nov 29, 2011, at 4:00 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > So due to issues when releasing project and missing md5/sha1 on some > env whereas not on other. > The vote is cancelled for more investigations. > > 2011/11/25 Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>: >> Hello, >> >> I'd like to release Apache Maven 3.0.4. >> >> We fixed 31 issues. >> See release notes: >> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=17215 >> >> The staged repo is available here: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-244/ . >> >> The staged distributions are available here: >> http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/3.0.4/ >> >> As we are near the week end, the vote will be a 5 days vote (which is >> around 120 hours) >> >> [+1] >> [0] >> [-1] >> >> Here my +1 >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> Olivier Lamy >> Talend: http://coders.talend.com >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > > > -- > Olivier Lamy > Talend: http://coders.talend.com > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > Thanks, Jason ---------------------------------------------------------- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven http://twitter.com/jvanzyl --------------------------------------------------------- People develop abstractions by generalizing from concrete examples. Every attempt to determine the correct abstraction on paper without actually developing a running system is doomed to failure. No one is that smart. A framework is a resuable design, so you develop it by looking at the things it is supposed to be a design of. The more examples you look at, the more general your framework will be. -- Ralph Johnson & Don Roberts, Patterns for Evolving Frameworks
