if this would work well for any project (even with modules), I see more 
problems with maven site itself [1]: checking out the site will check out 
every module ever done into Maven.
We'll need to find some way to limit the content checked out, IMHO

Regards,

Hervé


[1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/site/trunk/

Le dimanche 12 février 2012 11:23:52 Benson Margulies a écrit :
> There are many Apache projects using Maven for some or all of their
> websites, and I think it would be a good public service to smooth
> their path to the requirement to use svnpubsub.
> 
> After a bit of discussion on the infra list, I can now describe one
> scheme and I'd like to see what we can do to support it.
> 
> First, assume that the user is going to have svn 1.7 as a client.
> We're aiming at our fellow Apache developers; if infra recommends 1.7,
> we can in conscience aim at that.
> 
> So, the drill is as follows:
> 
> 1) svn co a tree from svn used to publish the site.
> 
> 2) remove all the local files, leaving the metadata.
> 
> 3) run the site plugin aiming at this location.
> 
> 4) svn remove all files in the metadata now absent from the tree, add
> all new files.
> 
> 5) Pause, optionally, for review.
> 
> 6) commit.
> 
> I was thinking that this could be expressed as a plugin with a couple
> of goals to add to the site lifecycle, combined with the plain old
> ordinary local file wagon. I wonder if the scm provider API is strong
> enough to handle step 4, or whether this has to be coded from scratch,
> or whether it's reasonable to imagine extending the scm provider API
> to go here.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to