On 13 February 2012 07:05, Kristian Rosenvold
<[email protected]> wrote:
> DAV has support for "lock" concept, which I somehow would
> assume a decent server-side implementation would map to a transaction?
> (I would rather improve dav_svn to make sure we can get 1 commit ;)
I would have concern getting transaction time-outs... dav_svn is going
to be over http/https and given the "fun" deploying the mojo sites at
codehaus over webdav... [I am working with Ben on a SCP container that
can provide the fast site deploy we currently have @Apache to
Codehaus... I wonder if infra would be open to allowing that container
to run on apache hardware to allow effectively the same thing?]
>
> Removed files should be quite simple; the server side file store is enumerable
> and it would seem like a nice addition to the site plugin
> ("mirrorImage" or similar)
> I would really prefer adding features that has value to everyone
>
> As for a lower efficiency I'm sure that's real but do we really care ?
> (I'm assuming
> we can get 1 svn transaction and the overhead would be DAV ping-pong and
> maybe content comparison)
>
> Kristian
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
