I guess it affects the repo layout, isn't? /maven-core/... /maven-core-its/...
Or how did you intend to set this up? LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Kristian Rosenvold <kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com> > To: Maven Developers List <dev@maven.apache.org>; Mark Struberg > <strub...@yahoo.de> > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 9:02 AM > Subject: Re: Flipping Maven Core to Git > > 2012/10/11 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>: >> What if we first merge the 2 repos into 1 git repo? >> >> Imo maven-core and the ITs must fit together! Having the ITs in a separate > repo will make people forget about them. > > None of them are big, we could easily merge them; conceptually they > belong together. It would seem like they should be merged with the > same source root. I assume the best way to do this would simply be to > flip m3 to git, then just add the complete history of core-its and > then just "merge" them on trunk... ? > > >> >> Also for a maven-core release it isn't a problem if the ITs get tagged. > I actually would even really appreciate that fact! > > Each core iIT is tagged with the initial maven version which it is > valid at (using a homebrew replacement of JUnit assumptions), which > means the full IT suite is self-configuring wrt which maven version it > is being run against. No need to tag it really. > > Kristian > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org