Hi Arnaud, Can you hold off one more day? I have a couple of fixes I want to get in, and I want to do a bit more testing.
Thanks! On 10/17/2012 01:34 AM, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > ok thx. > I'll do the release tomorrow > > Arnaud > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Robert Scholte <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Ok, I'm ready >> >> Op Tue, 16 Oct 2012 19:07:29 +0200 schreef Arnaud Héritier < >> [email protected]>: >> >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Robert Scholte <[email protected] >>>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I noticed that my MDEP-300 should be easy to fix, but I would need to >>>> write an IT with a custom packaging type. >>>> That would probably take some time, so I'll pick that up for the 2.7 >>>> >>>> >>> ok >>> >>> >>> I do like to add MDEP-380, a typical Maven3 + SNAPSHOT issue. It has a >>>> good patch, although I think that the useBaseVersion should be 'true' by >>>> default. I can fix that today or tomorrow. >>>> >>>> >>> ok let me know when it will be good on your side. >>> >>> thx >>> >>> >>> >>>> thanks, >>>> >>>> Robert >>>> >>>> Op Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:28:10 +0200 schreef Stephen Connolly < >>>> stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.****com >>>> <stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.**com<[email protected]> >>>>>> : >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> We should probably close MDEP-124 as WONT FIX given that there seems no >>>> >>>>> way >>>>> to fix it... or at least the addition of a configuration element to >>>>> allow >>>>> flagging specific dependencies as used even if they seem not. >>>>> >>>>> MDPE-166 also seems like it should just display a different output for >>>>> <scope>runtime</scope> namely something like "Unable to determine >>>>> whether >>>>> used or unused as scope is runtime" >>>>> >>>>> I think the above two "solutions" would be quick to implement and would >>>>> close the issues out. >>>>> >>>>> On 16 October 2012 14:18, Arnaud HERITIER <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> i would like to release the dependency plugin soon. >>>>>> There only too old issues not closed attached to the current version >>>>>> ( >>>>>> >>>>>> http://jira.codehaus.org/****browse/MDEP#selectedTab=com.**<http://jira.codehaus.org/**browse/MDEP#selectedTab=com.**> >>>>>> atlassian.jira.plugin.system.****project%3Aroadmap-panel<http:** >>>>>> //jira.codehaus.org/browse/**MDEP#selectedTab=com.** >>>>>> atlassian.jira.plugin.system.**project%3Aroadmap-panel<http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MDEP#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aroadmap-panel> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ) >>>>>> but I suppose they are migrated release after release without any real >>>>>> work >>>>>> on them. >>>>>> I'm interested especially by this fix to use it as report ( >>>>>> http://jira.codehaus.org/****browse/MDEP-366<http://jira.codehaus.org/**browse/MDEP-366> >>>>>> <http://jira.**codehaus.org/browse/MDEP-366<http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MDEP-366> >>>>>>> ) >>>>>> >>>>>> and it has the perf improvement >>>>>> with the plexus-utils upgrade (http://jira.codehaus.org/** >>>>>> browse/MDEP-377 >>>>>> <http://jira.codehaus.org/**browse/MDEP-377<http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MDEP-377> >>>>>>> ) >>>>>> >>>>>> Nobody against it ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- >>>>>> Arnaud Héritier >>>>>> http://aheritier.net >>>>>> Mail/GTalk: [email protected] >>>>>> Twitter/Skype : aheritier >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------****----------------------------** >>>> --**--------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected].****org< >>>> dev-unsubscribe@maven.**apache.org <[email protected]>> >>>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> [email protected].**org<[email protected]> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
