Hi Paul,

  Yes no problem I can do it tomorrow or this week end.
  I just would like to have it out before the end of next week

Cheers,

Arnaud

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Paul Gier <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Arnaud,
>
> Can you hold off one more day?  I have a couple of fixes I want to get
> in, and I want to do a bit more testing.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On 10/17/2012 01:34 AM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
> > ok thx.
> > I'll do the release tomorrow
> >
> > Arnaud
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Robert Scholte <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Ok, I'm ready
> >>
> >> Op Tue, 16 Oct 2012 19:07:29 +0200 schreef Arnaud Héritier <
> >> [email protected]>:
> >>
> >>  On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Robert Scholte <[email protected]
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I noticed that my MDEP-300 should be easy to fix, but I would need to
> >>>> write an IT with a custom packaging type.
> >>>> That would probably take some time, so I'll pick that up for the 2.7
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> ok
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  I do like to add MDEP-380, a typical Maven3 + SNAPSHOT issue. It has a
> >>>> good patch, although I think that the useBaseVersion should be 'true'
> by
> >>>> default. I can fix that today or tomorrow.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> ok let me know when it will be good on your side.
> >>>
> >>> thx
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> Robert
> >>>>
> >>>> Op Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:28:10 +0200 schreef Stephen Connolly <
> >>>> stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.****com <stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.
> **com<[email protected]>
> >>>>>> :
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>  We should probably close MDEP-124 as WONT FIX given that there seems
> no
> >>>>
> >>>>> way
> >>>>> to fix it... or at least the addition of a configuration element to
> >>>>> allow
> >>>>> flagging specific dependencies as used even if they seem not.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> MDPE-166 also seems like it should just display a different output
> for
> >>>>> <scope>runtime</scope> namely something like "Unable to determine
> >>>>> whether
> >>>>> used or unused as scope is runtime"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I think the above two "solutions" would be quick to implement and
> would
> >>>>> close the issues out.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 16 October 2012 14:18, Arnaud HERITIER <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  Hi all,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>   i would like to release the dependency plugin soon.
> >>>>>>   There only too old issues not closed attached to the current
> version
> >>>>>> (
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://jira.codehaus.org/****browse/MDEP#selectedTab=com.**<
> http://jira.codehaus.org/**browse/MDEP#selectedTab=com.**>
> >>>>>> atlassian.jira.plugin.system.****project%3Aroadmap-panel<http:**
> >>>>>> //jira.codehaus.org/browse/**MDEP#selectedTab=com.**
> >>>>>> atlassian.jira.plugin.system.**project%3Aroadmap-panel<
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MDEP#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aroadmap-panel
> >
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> )
> >>>>>> but I suppose they are migrated release after release without any
> real
> >>>>>> work
> >>>>>> on them.
> >>>>>>   I'm interested especially by this fix to use it as report (
> >>>>>> http://jira.codehaus.org/****browse/MDEP-366<
> http://jira.codehaus.org/**browse/MDEP-366>
> >>>>>> <http://jira.**codehaus.org/browse/MDEP-366<
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MDEP-366>
> >>>>>>> )
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> and it has the perf improvement
> >>>>>> with the plexus-utils upgrade (http://jira.codehaus.org/**
> >>>>>> browse/MDEP-377 <http://jira.codehaus.org/**browse/MDEP-377<
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MDEP-377>
> >>>>>>> )
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>   Nobody against it ?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -----
> >>>>>> Arnaud Héritier
> >>>>>> http://aheritier.net
> >>>>>> Mail/GTalk: [email protected]
> >>>>>> Twitter/Skype : aheritier
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>  ------------------------------****----------------------------**
> >>>> --**---------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected].****org<
> >>>> dev-unsubscribe@maven.**apache.org <[email protected]
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected].**org<
> [email protected]>
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>


-- 
-----
Arnaud Héritier
06-89-76-64-24
http://aheritier.net
Mail/GTalk: [email protected]
Twitter/Skype : aheritier

Reply via email to