On Nov 11, 2012, at 2:49 AM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:

> 
> Perso I propose a change by pointing you (you means other maven dev
> folks too) to a branch I made somewhere but you commit code without
> listening POV from others.
> If you could wait to hear what other thinks that could be lovely....

I believe you do exactly what you accuse me of Olivier. You did not propose a 
change, you pointed to your branch with a terse "fixed" as if it were a 
foregone conclusion.

I started the SLF4J work, I worked with Ceki to try and minimize the change, 
keep the ITs passing while preserving the existing behaviour and keeping the 
dependency size and complexity to a minimum. 

I've been working on restoring the behaviour and my goal, at least, was to 
reduce the possible complication of using a larger framework. The second I 
created the JIRA issue, you point at your branch and say "fixed" without any 
explanation. You used the console transfer listener not working -- and I admit 
that was annoying and I apologize for leaving it like that so long -- as a 
vehicle for adding your preferred logging framework. My goal was to introduce 
SLF4J in a minimal way, at least to start. So if that conflicts with your goal 
then that's fine but jumping in the middle of the work I'm doing with a change 
that proposes to throw away the work I did with SLF4J Simple is not fine. 
Couching it as me not taking into account a wider discussion as a response to 
me finishing what I started with a veto even less so.

I didn't change any of the dependencies, completed the work I started and fixed 
what I broke which I believe is reasonable. 

If the discussion is now transitioning to users want flexible logging and the 
choice of a logging framework that's fine. But I still maintain the CLI use of 
logging can be limited and constrained while allowing integrators to make the 
small changes necessary to add flexible logging. But if we want to choose a 
framework let's look at the options, if people want to go that route, and 
select the best option.

Reverting my commit will break the console transfer listener. The discussion 
about the use of a logging framework, and its choice if so decided, is not a 
foregone conclusion. So I will revert my commit in the morning when I wake up 
if you want the broken behaviour restored. But note I believe you are being 
unreasonable in that you haven't said a word until I raised the JIRA issue 
today and then took offense to me finishing my work while I was in the process 
of correcting what I broke. Obviously you were working on your branch while I 
was working on my fixes but nothing was brought up aside from JIRA.

You have made sweeping changes in the transport and while you have made 
improvements, you have introduced several things that don't work as they did 
previously -- and I have brought these up with you directly, especially as it 
pertains to security -- I have not jumped down your throat with a veto as I 
expect you will eventually fix them because you care about users. Please do me 
the same courtesy.

> 
> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> --
>>> Olivier Lamy
>>> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
>>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Jason
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> Jason van Zyl
>> Founder & CTO, Sonatype
>> Founder,  Apache Maven
>> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> We all have problems. How we deal with them is a measure of our worth.
>> 
>> -- Unknown
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> 

Thanks,

Jason

----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder & CTO, Sonatype
Founder,  Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
---------------------------------------------------------






Reply via email to