I thought about that, but I suspect that we are at least 1 week away from
being ready to cut 3.1.0 anyway, so 1 week seems safest and gives potential
volunteers time to chime in. If Jason thinks he will be ready to cut 3.1.0
in 4 days time, then I would consider 4 days...


On 26 February 2013 14:16, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think that a week is quite generous. I'd cut it down to 4 days. In
> any case, I support the general scheme here.
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Stephen Connolly
> <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I would propose that we give until this time next week for somebody to
> > stand up and state that they feel the isolation is necessary and that
> they
> > are prepared to do the work to implement the isolation.
> >
> > If there is at least one person committing themselves, then we should
> > discuss the timetable they see for the implementation of isolation, and
> > make a judgement call on the basis of that discussion.
> >
> > If there is nobody feeling strongly about isolation, then at that point I
> > think it is safe to proceed with cutting 3.1.0 (assuming it is ready at
> > that point, or if not ready by then, finish the remaining tasks)
> >
> > Until/unless somebody steps up, I would think it is safe to proceed on
> the
> > basis that the release will be cut as soon as it is ready and the week
> has
> > expired.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > -Stephen
> >
> >
> >
> > On 26 February 2013 14:05, Jason van Zyl <ja...@tesla.io> wrote:
> >
> >> As I posted previously I would like to do the 3.1.0 release but I don't
> >> want to do the work of isolating SLF4J until it's shown that it will be
> a
> >> problem. I don't the believe the adoption of 3.1.0 is going to be so
> quick
> >> that we can't create a fix if necessary. I would rather do the release
> in a
> >> lean style and not do work for theoretical problems.
> >>
> >> In full disclosure I have a release of Tesla I want to make and I
> already
> >> have JSR330, SLF4J/Logback, and Eclipse Aether integrated so I would
> like
> >> to try and help get the JSR330, SLF4J out the door and then get Eclipse
> >> Aether integrated.
> >>
> >> If anyone feels strongly about trying to create the SLF4J isolation and
> is
> >> going to start the work to do it shortly there's no harm in waiting.
> But I
> >> would prefer to start getting the 3.1.0 release out the door, get some
> >> feedback and adjust if necessary.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Jason
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------
> >> Jason van Zyl
> >> Founder & CTO, Sonatype
> >> Founder,  Apache Maven
> >> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Simplex sigillum veri. (Simplicity is the seal of truth.)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to