On Mar 3, 2013, at 2:23 PM, Mark Derricutt <m...@talios.com> wrote: > A quick answer whilst I let my thoughts dwell on the full long post.. > > If we're jumping to a major release here, is this a viable time to also > update the schema and address of the things we've long been wanting there? ( > mixins of some form ) - or is this out of scope ( of this discussion at least > ). >
To me it's out of scope. I want to get the API changes out there and signal the potential of major API breakages. Features can be rolled out whenever. To me the change in versions is to signal API breakage, not feature addition. > Mark > > > Jason van Zyl wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> No one seems to object to doing a release with the SLF4J support without the >> isolation so I wanted to discuss what happens when we integrate Eclipse >> Aether and suggest an alternate release path. > Thanks, Jason ---------------------------------------------------------- Jason van Zyl Founder & CTO, Sonatype Founder, Apache Maven http://twitter.com/jvanzyl --------------------------------------------------------- the course of true love never did run smooth ... -- Shakespeare
