Chances of understanding me: - Close friend: 50% - Other friend: 25% - Kiwi: 15% - Ozzy: 10% (that's you) - POHM: 8% - Yank: 5% - Spaniard: 1%
So don't feel too bad, you had a 90% chance of failure stacked against you ;-) I'd dearly love to contribute, but I will not and can not until it's nailed down that things are being done properly, and I mean the MOJO list, not this list. Both are questionable, though. My point about the volume of text from Olivier was valid and remains valid, with or without the non-smile pokey tongue. Those 1797 characters could have quietly done a lot of good. I hope it in no way offended Olivier, and if it did, I apologise. Enhancing the template is a fruitless exercise without agreement that it should be done. Besides, I was just throwing some backup Sebb's way when he was under attack... Yours incomprehensibly, Fred On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Barrie Treloar <baerr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 16 August 2013 08:54, Fred Cooke <fred.co...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It's funny that you cite "no time" and use the equivalent of 299.5 6 > digit > > revision numbers to send us an email on your lack of time. You could have > > done 299 releases to Sebb's quite reasonable standards with that much > > keyboard activity. Point made? :-p > > I don't understand your behaviour Fred. > > You want people to change but then you attack them personally (even if > you add a smiley face) > > As Olivier points out, this is open source volunteer work. > Perhaps you could actually help out and cut some code/releases? > You could even enhance the templates or release tooling to support > what you are asking for. > > I think you would get better responses if you didn't throw stones. > A worst case scenario is that those who are doing the work, don't > bother. How is that helping anyone? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
