I prefer this 3.1.x-SNAPSHOT value: the intent is more clear Regards,
Hervé Le samedi 14 septembre 2013 19:42:23 Arnaud Héritier a écrit : > No problem for me. At work I'm also applying this rule but we use > 3.1.x-SNAPSHOT. I didn't notice issues with this > > Cheers. > > --------- > Arnaud > > Le 14 sept. 2013 à 19:25, Jason van Zyl <ja...@tesla.io> a écrit : > > When a release fails like this it is annoying to have to rev back the > > version of the POM. I'm not sure who flipped the versions in the POM and > > while it's a little more visible to see what you're moving toward I > > prefer the pattern of: > > > > 3.1-SNAPSHOT --> 3.1.1 --> 3.1-SNAPSHOT --> 3.1.2 --> 3.1-SNAPSHOT > > > > I know this may not be obvious to the casual observer as they may think > > 3.1 is next, but I'm personally fine with that. > > > > Especially after a failed release because then I don't have to go change > > all the POMs (whether rolling back manually, using the release rollback, > > the version:set command, or whatever else). It's much easier to just fix > > what's necessary and carry on. > > > > Unless anyone objects I would like to go back this pattern, what I > > previously had, because it's far easier to manage. Ideally it might be > > nice if all the tools understood 3.1.z-SNAPSHOT but they don't an in lieu > > of that I would prefer not to diddle POMs after a failed release. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jason > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Jason van Zyl > > Founder, Apache Maven > > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
