On Sep 21, 2013, at 7:44 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 22 September 2013 03:09, Jason van Zyl <ja...@tesla.io> wrote: >> On Sep 21, 2013, at 6:16 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 21 September 2013 23:09, Jason van Zyl <ja...@tesla.io> wrote: >>> >>> It would still be automated. >>> However the source data would come form the vote e-mail, which makes >>> more sense to me. >>> >> >> If it were generated I would agree. Manually making an email is not >> automated or consistent. > > I don't care how the e-mail is created; it can be automated. > > What matters is that the content is understandable and complete. >
Ok, then we agree. We should try to keep the vote email threads for the votes. I think what you asked for was the impetus for the tool I made and it helped do a more complete audit than I've ever done manually. But the SCM coordinates are not a requirement for the release email currently and if we're going to discuss that then we probably shouldn't hijack the vote threads which we both just did. Thanks, Jason ---------------------------------------------------------- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven http://twitter.com/jvanzyl ---------------------------------------------------------
