On 22 September 2013 05:03, Jason van Zyl <ja...@tesla.io> wrote: > > On Sep 21, 2013, at 7:44 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 22 September 2013 03:09, Jason van Zyl <ja...@tesla.io> wrote: >>> On Sep 21, 2013, at 6:16 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 21 September 2013 23:09, Jason van Zyl <ja...@tesla.io> wrote: >>>> >>>> It would still be automated. >>>> However the source data would come form the vote e-mail, which makes >>>> more sense to me. >>>> >>> >>> If it were generated I would agree. Manually making an email is not >>> automated or consistent. >> >> I don't care how the e-mail is created; it can be automated. >> >> What matters is that the content is understandable and complete. >> > > Ok, then we agree. We should try to keep the vote email threads for the > votes. I think what you asked for was the impetus for the tool I made and it > helped do a more complete audit than I've ever done manually. But the SCM > coordinates are not a requirement for the release email currently and if > we're going to discuss that then we probably shouldn't hijack the vote > threads which we both just did.
I don't believe it's hijacking the vote e-mail to point out that it is missing vital information. But the subsequent discussion has certainly veered off-topic. > Thanks, > > Jason > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Jason van Zyl > Founder, Apache Maven > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > --------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
