Stephen, can I possibly get you to respond to the the questions about branches (or not) and version numbers for the POM's?
On February 23, 2014 2:00:24 PM EST, Stephen Connolly <[email protected]> wrote: >Well let's get the maven dep up to at least 3.0.4. > >Let's give users an announce that we are moving to only checking java >1.5 >compat via animal sniffer and that we will be building plugins with 1.6 >or >1.7 > >On Sunday, 23 February 2014, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> For this thread, I'd be content to get a plan for how to manage the >> poms to reflect the EOL of 2.x. The actual content of those poms can >> argued over by committing an initial proposal. >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Benson Margulies ><[email protected]<javascript:;>> >> wrote: >> > I would have expected our first step would be to set source and >target >> > to 1.6, and move the Maven core dependencies to 3.0.x. I don't see >why >> > the fact that the core was compiled with target=1.5 would have any >> > impact here. >> > >> > I'd like to avoid a disorganized process of individual plugins and >> > components getting complex stuff into their poms, each one a bit >> > different. >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Stephen Connolly >> > <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: >> >> Keep in mind that maven 3.0-3.1.x are still java 1.5 and we >haven't put >> a >> >> version policy in place. >> >> >> >> Personally speaking I'm fine with plugins requiring java 1.6 and >maven >> >> 3.2.1 as a minimum, but I'd rather see 3.3.x get some legs first >and I >> >> suspect we'll have a few 3.2.x releases as we have EOL'd 2.x >> >> >> >> On Sunday, 23 February 2014, Benson Margulies ><[email protected]<javascript:;>> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> I propose to make releases of our parent stack that are suitable >for >> >>> components and plugins that are making the leap to Java 1.6 and >Maven >> >>> 3 as their base requirements. >> >>> >> >>> What do people think is the right approach in terms of what stays >on >> >>> trunk and what goes on a branch, and whether to do anything >> >>> distinctive to the version numbers? >> >>> >> >>> >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >[email protected]<javascript:;><javascript:;> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: >[email protected]<javascript:;><javascript:;> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Sent from my phone >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] ><javascript:;> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] ><javascript:;> >> >> > >-- >Sent from my phone -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
