-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13753/#review25448
-----------------------------------------------------------


nice test!


src/tests/slave_recovery_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/13753/#comment49855>

    s/in/on/



src/tests/slave_recovery_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/13753/#comment49856>

    Is it guaranteed that the slaves offers won't be collapsed in one 
resourceOffers call? If yes, this needs a comment.



src/tests/slave_recovery_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/13753/#comment49857>

    Instead of this, would it be cleaner to just start the 2nd slave after the 
first slave's offer is received by the framework?



src/tests/slave_recovery_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/13753/#comment49858>

    pull this down to where the second slave is started.



src/tests/slave_recovery_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/13753/#comment49859>

    These should be in a while loop for the command executor's reaper to reap 
it.


- Vinod Kone


On Aug. 22, 2013, 11:14 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/13753/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 22, 2013, 11:14 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Ben Mahler, Ian Downes, Vinod 
> Kone, and Jiang Yan Xu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/slave_recovery_tests.cpp 548e8c0 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13753/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> Mac and Linux, repeat 100 times.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jie Yu
> 
>

Reply via email to