> On Oct. 22, 2013, 10:44 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote: > > We can also expose this as a new statistic "mem_usage_bytes", leaving > > "mem_rss_bytes" unchanged. Do you think differentiating the two would be > > beneficial or is rss not measured correctly?
+1 - Vinod ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14825/#review27340 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Oct. 22, 2013, 8:07 a.m., Eric Biederman wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/14825/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 22, 2013, 8:07 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Ian Downes, and Vinod Kone. > > > Bugs: Mesos-758 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/Mesos-758 > > > Repository: mesos-git > > > Description > ------- > > cgroup_isolator: Report the actual amount of memory used > > Report the number of bytes used by the memory cgroup, and stop > reporting memory with no file backed pages taken into account. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/slave/cgroups_isolator.cpp fc36f1f > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14825/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Verified that memory.stat:rss is the wrong value. > Verified that memory.usage_in_bytes is the correct value. > > make check > > Verified the code is idiomatic and trivial. > > > > Thanks, > > Eric Biederman > >
