-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17636/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Feb. 9, 2014, 1:13 a.m.)


Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Ben Mahler, Niklas Nielsen, and 
Vinod Kone.


Changes
-------

Rebased on master.


Repository: mesos-git


Description
-------

Adds valgrind runnables for executing memory / leak checks on mesos. 


Diffs (updated)
-----

  bin/memcheck-mesos-local.sh.in PRE-CREATION 
  bin/memcheck-mesos-master.sh.in PRE-CREATION 
  bin/memcheck-mesos-slave.sh.in PRE-CREATION 
  bin/memcheck-mesos-tests.sh.in PRE-CREATION 
  configure.ac 4f988a9 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17636/diff/


Testing
-------

$ mkdir build && bootstrap && cd build && ../configure && make check

$ build/bin/memcheck-mesos-tests.sh

Output:

[...]
[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 221 tests from 39 test cases ran. (99862 ms total)
[  PASSED  ] 218 tests.
[  FAILED  ] 3 tests, listed below:
[  FAILED  ] AttributesTest.Parsing
[  FAILED  ] ResourcesTest.Parsing
[  FAILED  ] ResourcesTest.Resources

 3 FAILED TESTS
  YOU HAVE 2 DISABLED TESTS

==3061== 
==3061== HEAP SUMMARY:
==3061==     in use at exit: 1,582,309 bytes in 24,258 blocks
==3061==   total heap usage: 4,401,619 allocs, 4,377,361 frees, 990,983,846 
bytes allocated
==3061== 
==3061== LEAK SUMMARY:
==3061==    definitely lost: 107,320 bytes in 662 blocks
==3061==    indirectly lost: 1,045,445 bytes in 16,342 blocks
==3061==      possibly lost: 166,492 bytes in 2,758 blocks
==3061==    still reachable: 263,052 bytes in 4,496 blocks
==3061==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==3061== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==3061== 
==3061== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==3061== Use --track-origins=yes to see where uninitialised values come from
==3061== ERROR SUMMARY: 38038 errors from 172 contexts (suppressed: 2 from 2)


Thanks,

TILL TOENSHOFF

Reply via email to