> On Feb. 14, 2014, 12:59 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/http.cpp, lines 1-8
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/17341/diff/3/?file=484624#file484624line1>
> >
> >     Looks like we could add some includes here:
> >     
> >     #include <cstring>
> >     #include <iostream>
> >     #include <string>
> >     
> >     #include <process/future.hpp>
> >     
> >     #include <stout/lambda.hpp>
> >     #include <stout/nothing.hpp>
> >     #include <stout/option.hpp>
> >     #include <stout/os.hpp>
> >     #include <stout/try.hpp>

just added them


- Charlie


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17341/#review34447
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 19, 2014, 8:18 p.m., Charlie Carson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/17341/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 19, 2014, 8:18 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-936
>     
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-936
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
>     move process::http namespace into http.cpp
> 
>     This moves the code declared in the process::http namespace to
>     be in it's own file (http.cpp).  It already had it's own header.
> 
>     SEE:  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-936
> 
>     Review: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17341
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/Makefile.am bcb78a45788fe93c520a787c2b614d49c354e633 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/http.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp 
> 7bf2d70c59455f52b26374f78198c5c7dc0a883b 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17341/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Charlie Carson
> 
>

Reply via email to