-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18339/#review35189
-----------------------------------------------------------


Have you looked at the source code of the open source Mesos frameworks to make 
sure we won't be breaking them? I seem to recall Chronos or Marathon using ':'.

- Ben Mahler


On Feb. 21, 2014, 6:21 p.m., Dominic Hamon wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/18339/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 21, 2014, 6:21 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-361
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-361
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> It would be good to have specific unit tests for these validators. I could 
> pull out the validation to another file and add unit tests on them.
> 
> Final validation for TaskID is awaiting consensus (or as close as we can get) 
> on bug/mailing list. I do prefer to be conservative but I don't want to break 
> users.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.hpp 9d1b56c6b02eb21130f165848297ae0695ac2af7 
>   src/master/master.cpp cb46869cd298f3a4fcbe8e4e3fea4bb7c741a0e0 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18339/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> built. ran make check. ran local master/slave/python framework.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dominic Hamon
> 
>

Reply via email to