-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18403/#review35428
-----------------------------------------------------------


This doesn't apply to master; could you please rebase and update.
{noformat}
[1011][idownes:mesos]$ git fetch origin
[1011][idownes:mesos]$ git status
# On branch master
nothing to commit, working directory clean
[1011][idownes:mesos]$ ./support/apply-review.sh 18403
--2014-02-25 10:11:50--  https://reviews.apache.org/r/18403/diff/raw/
Resolving reviews.apache.org... 140.211.11.74
Connecting to reviews.apache.org|140.211.11.74|:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 29338 (29K) [text/x-patch]
Saving to: ‘18403.patch’

100%[==================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================>]
 29,338      --.-K/s   in 0.05s

2014-02-25 10:11:50 (527 KB/s) - ‘18403.patch’ saved [29338/29338]

error: patch failed: src/slave/slave.hpp:105
error: src/slave/slave.hpp: patch does not apply
Failed to apply patch
{noformat}

- Ian Downes


On Feb. 24, 2014, 7:58 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/18403/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 24, 2014, 7:58 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Benjamin Hindman, Ben Mahler, Ian Downes, 
> TILL TOENSHOFF, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-922
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-922
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch delegates the choice of executor to the containerizer by removing 
> executorInfo dependencies up until Containerizer::launch().
> Containerizer::launch() now returns a future to the executor info that is 
> being run and the slave creates the corresponding executor structure when 
> launch completes.
> This means message handling from the running executor to the slave in the 
> interim where the executor structure has not created, need to be enqueued 
> until executor is ready. So far, registerExecutor() and reregisterExecutor() 
> has been split into two continuations to deal with this issue.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/containerizer.hpp d9ae326 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos_containerizer.hpp ee1fd30 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos_containerizer.cpp 6d990cb 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp d82d4e9 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp 7ad8232 
>   src/tests/containerizer.hpp 5686398 
>   src/tests/containerizer.cpp bfb9341 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18403/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Niklas Nielsen
> 
>

Reply via email to