-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18639/#review35847
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/tests/isolator_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/18639/#comment66620>

    Hm.. what will happen in the future if the Isolator rejects 100 cpus for 
being larger than the machine resources? Can we just write a unit test against 
the cgroups::cpu wrapper functions now that we have them?


- Ben Mahler


On Feb. 28, 2014, 8:54 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/18639/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 28, 2014, 8:54 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-1049
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1049
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/isolators/cgroups/cpushare.cpp 
> 160e8fe5eb06a2f65924734157b7b8d468d8be36 
>   src/tests/isolator_tests.cpp c9d4da84f37c182f5d13281db5193026a16045dd 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18639/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Verified manually by changing the cpu shares to 13.5 in 
> LimitedCpuIsolatorTest.
> 
> Didn't change the test in this diff because I want to come up with a test 
> that runs for all users and doesn't take too much time.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vinod Kone
> 
>

Reply via email to