> On March 19, 2014, 12:45 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > src/slave/slave.hpp, line 440
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/18403/diff/5/?file=522998#file522998line440>
> >
> >     Why do we need this?
> >     
> >     Why not just set Executor::id appropriately in the constructor?
> >
> 
> Niklas Nielsen wrote:
>     Good point!

We need the id before we have an executor structure; created in 
Framework::launch() which is called in _runTask() and we already need it in 
runTask()


> On March 19, 2014, 12:45 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > src/slave/slave.cpp, line 588
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/18403/diff/5/?file=522999#file522999line588>
> >
> >     Why is this a CHECK? What guarantees that the executor info is set when 
> > we are here?

Actually, several executor infos might be in flight when a reregistration 
happens; we will need to split reregistration in two and do a collect().onAny() 
on them. How does that sound?


- Niklas


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18403/#review37753
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 20, 2014, 9:53 a.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/18403/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 20, 2014, 9:53 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ian Downes and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-922
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-922
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch delegates the choice of executor to the containerizer by removing 
> executorInfo dependencies up until Containerizer::launch().
> Containerizer::launch() now returns a future to the executor info that is 
> being run and the slave creates the corresponding executor structure when 
> launch completes.
> This means message handling from the running executor to the slave in the 
> interim where the executor structure has not created, need to be enqueued 
> until executor is ready. So far, registerExecutor() and reregisterExecutor() 
> has been split into two continuations to deal with this issue.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/containerizer.hpp d9ae326 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos_containerizer.hpp ee1fd30 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos_containerizer.cpp c819c97 
>   src/slave/http.cpp 594032d 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp 01b80df 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp d8d3e0f 
>   src/tests/containerizer.hpp 5686398 
>   src/tests/containerizer.cpp bfb9341 
>   src/tests/gc_tests.cpp ac547cf 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18403/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Niklas Nielsen
> 
>

Reply via email to