> On March 18, 2014, 7:19 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/state/log.cpp, line 377
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/19007/diff/1/?file=515951#file515951line377>
> >
> >     Maybe not for this review. We enqueue a truncate operation for each 
> > set/expunge. As a result, multiple truncate operations can get queued. 
> > IIUC, consecutive truncate operations seems to be wasteful as only the 
> > first one has an effect, right?
> >     
> >     I understand the current code won't cause any log layer operation as 
> > you remember the 'truncated' field. But acquiring/releasing mutex is also 
> > expensive as it prevents set/expunge from being executed.
> >     
> >     Maybe we should consider doing the following: if there is a truncate 
> > operation pending, do not enqueue another truncate?

There is already a TODO for that above the definition of 
'LogStorageProcess::truncate()'! ;)


- Benjamin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19007/#review37576
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 31, 2014, 7:11 a.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/19007/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 31, 2014, 7:11 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This is a combination of both https://reviews.apache.org/r/17423 and 
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/17424 which have been merged to make it easier 
> to make changes.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/Makefile.am 47d03b393f68ebd4e9eba3206798a939078023c0 
>   src/messages/state.proto 7f7a8a505d6f24b01fec0c3ad47b0e15b2b17ffa 
>   src/state/log.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/state/log.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/tests/state_tests.cpp d0e084070c566ee7d751a8e1279772e05b966145 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19007/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Hindman
> 
>

Reply via email to