> On April 9, 2014, 10:57 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> > src/state/log.cpp, line 455
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/19007/diff/1-2/?file=515951#file515951line455>
> >
> >     Alternatively, since you've already ensured the entry is present:
> >     
> >     const Snapshot& snapshot = snapshots[entry.name()];
> >     
> >     But I suppose it would be good to be prudent and avoid the non-const 
> > map operation. We could also pull out the Option<Snapshot>:
> >     
> >     Option<Snapshot> snapshot = snapshots.get(entry.name());
> >     
> >     if (snapshot.isNone()) {
> >       return false;
> >     }
> >     ...
> >     
> >     The .get(...).get() pattern seems a bit unfortunate in general.

I cant use the [] operator because Snapshot is not default constructible. Great 
suggestion to use Option<Snapshot>, I've updated all 'get' calls to this 
pattern instead. Thanks Ben!


- Benjamin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19007/#review39958
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 31, 2014, 7:11 a.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/19007/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 31, 2014, 7:11 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This is a combination of both https://reviews.apache.org/r/17423 and 
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/17424 which have been merged to make it easier 
> to make changes.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/Makefile.am 47d03b393f68ebd4e9eba3206798a939078023c0 
>   src/messages/state.proto 7f7a8a505d6f24b01fec0c3ad47b0e15b2b17ffa 
>   src/state/log.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/state/log.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/tests/state_tests.cpp d0e084070c566ee7d751a8e1279772e05b966145 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19007/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Hindman
> 
>

Reply via email to