-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20970/#review42076
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Please go ahead and commit this, but first, please wrap comments at 70 
characters. (I've seen a number of patches lately not doing this but this is 
actually part of our (unfortunately) implicit style).


3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/os_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/20970/#comment75822>

    Consider having this loop fail after a certain amount of time has passed, 
akin to what is done in OsTest.killtree


- Ben Mahler


On May 2, 2014, 8:48 p.m., Ian Downes wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/20970/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 2, 2014, 8:48 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Uses kill(0, pid) to check pid validity. This is much cheaper than using 
> os::process(pid) which constructs a full Process object. Works regardless of 
> permission to signal the pid.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/os/exists.hpp 
> d9860d754e04f4ab5cc8f0a095b758ec62626b90 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/os_tests.cpp 
> 94eb256d24bc001660d63bd91b608988205a3d09 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20970/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> # Added a test
> make check 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ian Downes
> 
>

Reply via email to