> On May 9, 2014, 6:33 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/external_containerizer.cpp, line 714
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/21040/diff/2/?file=573989#file573989line714>
> >
> >     We'll still probably want/need to specify something like the slave's ID 
> > and/or meta and/or work directory to enable the ECP to distinguish 
> > different slaves from one another. Probably best to put this in the 
> > environment.

Yes, this has actually bitten me in the upcoming test_containerizer C++ 
implementation when getting exercised via SlaveRecoverTests - great catch, 
thanks Ben!


- Till


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21040/#review42084
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 11, 2014, 8:24 p.m., Till Toenshoff wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/21040/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 11, 2014, 8:24 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Niklas Nielsen.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Updates 'containers' implementation within the ExternalContainerizer to 
> forward the call to the ECP.
> Adds new 'containers' proto message to containers.proto.
> 
> Some minor cleanups like removing of needless namespace mentions that slipped 
> through.
> 
> NOTE: The test_containerizer.py implementation of 'containers' is incomplete, 
> it merely poses as a mock-up.
> NOTE: This does *not* fix MESOS-1257.
> A complete test_containerizer C++ implementation is upcoming to fix these 
> notes.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/containerizer/containerizer.proto c926a7f 
>   src/examples/python/test_containerizer.py 7bebfee 
>   src/slave/containerizer/external_containerizer.hpp 8fdf097 
>   src/slave/containerizer/external_containerizer.cpp e51ac66 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21040/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make (tests are currently disabled)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Till Toenshoff
> 
>

Reply via email to