-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21464/#review43044
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/slave/flags.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/21464/#comment77040>

    How about "registration_backoff_factor" or "registration_backoff_constant" 
since jitter to me means "the undesired deviation from true periodicity" which 
is not what we're using this for.
    
    Rather this is the multiplicative factor in our binary backoff:
    
    [0, c * 2^0]
    [0, c * 2^1]
    [0, c * 2^2]
        ...
    
    We're setting 'c' here, right?


- Ben Mahler


On May 14, 2014, 10:05 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/21464/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 14, 2014, 10:05 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Jiang Yan Xu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-1276
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1276
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/constants.hpp c0975254d51fc21dbf3bc006b3169886347f0a3f 
>   src/slave/constants.cpp 1854b16f2c1ed2ae51d2061b0338c3eda4f3b403 
>   src/slave/flags.hpp 8616817b9602f6ccf56e2af61f36c1bd295df1a1 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp 29d2a1607a2b3c4443ea14d1cc2b61a065df3cad 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp f8ed65bf7b7e4f3c0834c9e22a525137856e9b23 
>   src/tests/fault_tolerance_tests.cpp 
> 4796149beb10a6c668762f5efecd86520b809c42 
>   src/tests/master_tests.cpp 7aa678afc94869c8243485bd0604532dec43a1e2 
>   src/tests/mesos.cpp 242d98ad195a8ab1256918c48a2956e2e085d26d 
>   src/tests/slave_recovery_tests.cpp 85c57b29f6a56683e0df9788dea64ebb36e00812 
>   src/tests/slave_tests.cpp dfbc6481a3a1c6fc234dea48bcfe14deab0bea86 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21464/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vinod Kone
> 
>

Reply via email to