-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21464/#review43057
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/slave/constants.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/21464/#comment77078>

    "jitter"?



src/slave/slave.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/21464/#comment77087>

    I think we need to update 'authenticate' to deal with the fact that it can 
now be invoked asynchronously. Namely, it needs to check whether we still need 
to authenticate, much like doReliableRegistration checks if we still need to 
register.


- Ben Mahler


On May 14, 2014, 11:06 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/21464/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 14, 2014, 11:06 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Jiang Yan Xu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-1276
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1276
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/constants.hpp c0975254d51fc21dbf3bc006b3169886347f0a3f 
>   src/slave/constants.cpp 1854b16f2c1ed2ae51d2061b0338c3eda4f3b403 
>   src/slave/flags.hpp 8616817b9602f6ccf56e2af61f36c1bd295df1a1 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp 29d2a1607a2b3c4443ea14d1cc2b61a065df3cad 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp f8ed65bf7b7e4f3c0834c9e22a525137856e9b23 
>   src/tests/fault_tolerance_tests.cpp 
> 4796149beb10a6c668762f5efecd86520b809c42 
>   src/tests/master_tests.cpp 7aa678afc94869c8243485bd0604532dec43a1e2 
>   src/tests/mesos.cpp 242d98ad195a8ab1256918c48a2956e2e085d26d 
>   src/tests/slave_recovery_tests.cpp 85c57b29f6a56683e0df9788dea64ebb36e00812 
>   src/tests/slave_tests.cpp dfbc6481a3a1c6fc234dea48bcfe14deab0bea86 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21464/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vinod Kone
> 
>

Reply via email to