-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21246/#review42557
-----------------------------------------------------------


Bad patch!

Reviews applied: [21246]

Failed command: git apply --index 21246.patch

Error:
 error: patch failed: 
3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/protobuf.hpp:473
error: 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/protobuf.hpp: patch 
does not apply
error: patch failed: 
3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/protobuf_tests.cpp:73
error: 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/protobuf_tests.cpp: patch does 
not apply
error: patch failed: 
3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/protobuf_tests.pb.h:480
error: 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/protobuf_tests.pb.h: patch does 
not apply
error: patch failed: 
3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/protobuf_tests.pb.cc:53
error: 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/protobuf_tests.pb.cc: patch 
does not apply
error: patch failed: 
3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/protobuf_tests.proto:63
error: 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/protobuf_tests.proto: patch 
does not apply


- Mesos ReviewBot


On May 9, 2014, 12:26 a.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/21246/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 9, 2014, 12:26 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Benjamin Hindman.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Previously, only optional fields which where explicitly set would be 
> serialized regardless whether default values was present.
> This patch adds those fields explicitly.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/protobuf.hpp ddc13e9 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/protobuf_tests.cpp d1a58fc 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/protobuf_tests.pb.h 75a3919 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/protobuf_tests.pb.cc 169e177 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/protobuf_tests.proto 2c38489 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21246/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Protobuf test case has been expanded with
> 1) Optional field _without_ default value -> should not be serialized.
> 2) Optional field _with_ default value -> *should* be serialized
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Niklas Nielsen
> 
>

Reply via email to