True, but adding inline to a large function like this makes me antsy.
Moving it to its own source file also reduces the dependency requirements
when including the header.


On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Benjamin Mahler
<[email protected]>wrote:

> What were the linking problems here? It just looks like the 'inline'
> keyword was missing?
>
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Till Toenshoff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/21829/#review43784
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Ship it!
>>
>>
>> Ship it!
>>
>> Thanks for this quick and proper fix, Dominic.
>>
>> - Till Toenshoff
>>
>>
>> On May 22, 2014, 9:40 p.m., Dominic Hamon wrote:
>> >
>> > -----------------------------------------------------------
>> > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/21829/
>> > -----------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > (Updated May 22, 2014, 9:40 p.m.)
>> >
>> >
>> > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Till Toenshoff.
>> >
>> >
>> > Repository: mesos-git
>> >
>> >
>> > Description
>> > -------
>> >
>> > see summary. This also causes problems when building executables that
>> link against libmesos and include mesos_containerizer.hpp
>> >
>> >
>> > Diffs
>> > -----
>> >
>> >   src/Makefile.am ae576c5eca2eb8787b5a742cd7c5651904f360b2
>> >   src/usage/usage.hpp af04a6ae5191a154904ca26fb19dd594c4da9246
>> >   src/usage/usage.cpp PRE-CREATION
>> >
>> > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21829/diff/
>> >
>> >
>> > Testing
>> > -------
>> >
>> > make check
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Dominic Hamon
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to