> On July 16, 2014, 4:04 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> > src/tests/health_check_tests.cpp, line 79
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/23443/diff/4/?file=632794#file632794line79>
> >
> >     Please add a newline above and a comment that explains why we need to 
> > do this and why we're calling this MESOS_LAUNCHER_DIR. In fact, I was 
> > expecting the slave to always set this environment variable (like your old 
> > patch did originally), but I think this is fine for now. Also, minor nit: 
> > s/Environment_Variable* var/Environment::Variable* variable/. Thanks Tim!

Sounds good, I just reverted the EXPECT ASSERT changes and addressed your 
comment.
The tests has been passing all night so far. Thanks!


- Timothy


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23443/#review47891
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 16, 2014, 5:30 p.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/23443/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 16, 2014, 5:30 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Ben Mahler, Jie Yu, and Niklas Nielsen.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-1533
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1533
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Currently the health check tests are disabled as it was flaky. Part of the 
> reason is that all assertions was EXPECTs instead of ASSERTs so it will 
> continue to execute. 
> Another issue was it's currently discovering the path to launch health check 
> executable from the command executor main argv[0] path.
> However, the correct path is to launch the generated script that does library 
> path resolution, which is the parent of .libs.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/launcher/executor.cpp a573637 
>   src/tests/health_check_tests.cpp 44711fd 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23443/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Timothy Chen
> 
>

Reply via email to