-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23997/#review48926
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Looks good, just a few minor cleanups and we can get this committed!


src/master/main.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/23997/#comment85719>

    Please use the existing TODO format: add your handle and make it a sentence 
(end with a period).



src/master/main.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/23997/#comment85717>

    Looks like we should only parse the zk.get() string if it doesn't start 
with "file://":
    
    Try<URL> url;
    
    if (strings::startsWith(zk.get(), "file://")) {
      ...
    } else {
      url = URL::parse(zk.get());
    }



src/master/main.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/23997/#comment85718>

    I see this is copied, but this should include the error reason to help the 
operator:
    
    EXIT(1) << "Failed to read from file at '" + path + "': " << read.error();


- Ben Mahler


On July 28, 2014, 10:36 p.m., Ken Sipe wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/23997/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 28, 2014, 10:36 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-1635
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1635
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Fixes MESOS-1635 "zk flag fails when specifying a file and the replicated 
> logs"
> 
> replaced the current TODO with code :)  The code is consistent with similar 
> types of checks elsewhere in code.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/main.cpp 4d39c355eae948ede492d84de2e58a26756b781a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23997/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> The code change is simple and no unit test is provided.  It compiles, passes 
> style check and is functional via manual check.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ken Sipe
> 
>

Reply via email to