> On June 23, 2014, 6:50 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > src/slave/slave.cpp, line 1185
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/22313/diff/11/?file=612826#file612826line1185>
> >
> >     Also, what about launching the tasks after updating resources in 
> > registerExecutor()?
> 
> Yifan Gu wrote:
>     Sounds good, Should I do it in this patch or open a new JIRA?
> 
> Vinod Kone wrote:
>     this one is fine. in fact i would prefer to registerExecutor() one first 
> because that is going to affect all executors. the one in launchTask() when 
> executor is RUNNING can be done latter (maybe in a subsequent patch) because 
> that only affects executors that have multiple tasks.
> 
> Yifan Gu wrote:
>     Ok. Will do, I just reverted this patch.
> 
> Yifan Gu wrote:
>     And I found we need to do this too in reregisterExecutor()...
> 
> Vinod Kone wrote:
>     What did you revert? I still see container update() being called in 
> runTask().
> 
> Yifan Gu wrote:
>     Sorry for confusion. By 'revert' I mean now, I don't put the executor in 
> pending anymore, and I do a check on NULL framework and NULL executor as 
> before.
>     I haven't done the (re)registerExecutor() stuff. Will try to do it 
> tomorrow.
>     
>     But still, I will need some review on this one, since the approach on 
> (re)registerExecutor will almost be the same as this one.
>     Thanks Vinod!
> 
> Vinod Kone wrote:
>     OK. Can you resolve or drop (with comments) the issues that were raised?

Can you add a TODO and open a ticket to track this?


- Vinod


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22313/#review46429
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 6, 2014, 1:11 a.m., Yifan Gu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/22313/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 6, 2014, 1:11 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ian Downes and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-886
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-886
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added __runTask() to wait for the completion of containerizer->update() and 
> check the result before sending RunTaskMessage.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp c12cd0a 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp c56cac8 
>   src/tests/slave_tests.cpp 3a7fee6 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22313/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> SlaveTest.WillNotLaunchTaskBeforeContainerizerUpdate
> SlaveTest.WillNotLaunchTaskIfFrameworkIsRemoved
> SlaveTest.LaunchTaskAfterContainerizerUpdate
> 
> ./bin/mesos-tests.sh --gtest_repeat=-1 --gtest_break_on_failure 
> --gtest_filter=*LaunchTask*
> 
> successful times > 2000
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> File Attachments
> ----------------
> 
> framework will exit
>   
> https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/06/18/fbe73273-7aa9-4faa-b1c5-003ab03042a9__issue-886.diff
> log
>   
> https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/06/18/84d801a0-5c2a-4bb9-901b-e1962031461c__log
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Yifan Gu
> 
>

Reply via email to