-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25789/#review54549
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/strings.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/25789/#comment94723>

    Very useful comment, thanks Joris!



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/strings.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/25789/#comment94722>

    Silly style thing, please move 'stream' to newline.



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/strings_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/25789/#comment94720>

    Just a style thing, we tend to declare/define as close to where they're 
used as possible (i.e., not C style).



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/strings_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/25789/#comment94721>

    Silly style thing, but in this case both arguments should be indented the 
same.


- Benjamin Hindman


On Sept. 25, 2014, 5:10 p.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/25789/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 25, 2014, 5:10 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Benjamin Hindman.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add Variadic strings join.
> There is a second version of the variadic join which takes a reference to a 
> stringstream as a parameter. This is handy when strings::join is just a part 
> of a larger string manipulation.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/strings.hpp a1702cd 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/strings_tests.cpp 51008e5 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25789/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran make check for stout. Added test cases for join as these were missing.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joris Van Remoortere
> 
>

Reply via email to