-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26476/#review55945
-----------------------------------------------------------



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/option.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26476/#comment96309>

    std::move is not in the C++11 tests in configure.ac so it cannot yet be 
used.



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/option.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26476/#comment96310>

    This makes Option arbitrarily large which could be problematic where we 
copy it (we can't assume move semantics).
    
    I don't understand the benefit of this change. We have so many dynamic 
allocations throughout the code-base, it seems like a strange place to focus 
attention.


- Dominic Hamon


On Oct. 8, 2014, 6:35 p.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/26476/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 8, 2014, 6:35 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Niklas Nielsen.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Remove dynamic allocations from Option class.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/option.hpp 47fe92c 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26476/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> support/mesos-style.py
> valgrind (reduced allocation count)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joris Van Remoortere
> 
>

Reply via email to