+1 seems like a simple start and should aid discovery On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Dave Lester <daveles...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'd suggest making the GH org home to community frameworks/modules. > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Dominic Hamon <dha...@twopensource.com> > wrote: > > > I think this is a reasonable start, but I'm not sure if you're suggesting > > we make the mesos org the home for the community frameworks/modules, or > > that we will maintain forks of those frameworks and modules in the mesos > > org. > > > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Dave Lester <daveles...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi All, > >> > >> To push forward one portion of the conversation re: Mesos extension > >> hosting > >> and a shared registry (MESOS-1759 > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1759>), I'd like to > suggest > >> that we begin using the existing Mesos GitHub org ( > >> https://github.com/mesos/) > >> for community frameworks and modules. This is already happening in > >> practice > >> (see: mesos-go bindings, storm, hadoop + others already w/in the org), > >> however I don't think this has explicitly been called out as an > >> opportunity > >> for folks to use. > >> > >> IMHO, opening this up to all is a good idea. I'd also recommend > explicitly > >> calling out the fact that while these projects are w/in the Mesos org on > >> GH, they are not explicitly Apache projects. Any objections or > >> suggestions? > >> > >> If this sounds good, I can add related documentation. > >> > >> Dave > >> > > > > > > -- > > Dominic Hamon | @mrdo | Twitter > > *There are no bad ideas; only good ideas that go horribly wrong.* > > >
-- Cheers, Chris Aniszczyk http://aniszczyk.org +1 512 961 6719