+1 seems like a simple start and should aid discovery

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Dave Lester <daveles...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'd suggest making the GH org home to community frameworks/modules.
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Dominic Hamon <dha...@twopensource.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I think this is a reasonable start, but I'm not sure if you're suggesting
> > we make the mesos org the home for the community frameworks/modules, or
> > that we will maintain forks of those frameworks and modules in the mesos
> > org.
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Dave Lester <daveles...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> To push forward one portion of the conversation re: Mesos extension
> >> hosting
> >> and a shared registry (MESOS-1759
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1759>), I'd like to
> suggest
> >> that we begin using the existing Mesos GitHub org (
> >> https://github.com/mesos/)
> >> for community frameworks and modules. This is already happening in
> >> practice
> >> (see: mesos-go bindings, storm, hadoop + others already w/in the org),
> >> however I don't think this has explicitly been called out as an
> >> opportunity
> >> for folks to use.
> >>
> >> IMHO, opening this up to all is a good idea. I'd also recommend
> explicitly
> >> calling out the fact that while these projects are w/in the Mesos org on
> >> GH, they are not explicitly Apache projects. Any objections or
> >> suggestions?
> >>
> >> If this sounds good, I can add related documentation.
> >>
> >> Dave
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dominic Hamon | @mrdo | Twitter
> > *There are no bad ideas; only good ideas that go horribly wrong.*
> >
>


-- 
Cheers,

Chris Aniszczyk
http://aniszczyk.org
+1 512 961 6719

Reply via email to