Of course it will be optional, any solution should be. But using github org specifically limits the people that can use it.
A standalone registry removes the barrier to entry. As I said, it's a great start but deeper thought is probably needed for a final solution. On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If it's optional I don't see a problem > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Dominic Hamon <dha...@twopensource.com> > wrote: > > > > That's going to cause issues for any companies that use existing github > > orgs and have internal restrictions on how they can share their open > source > > work. > > > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Dave Lester <daveles...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > I'd suggest making the GH org home to community frameworks/modules. > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Dominic Hamon < > dha...@twopensource.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> I think this is a reasonable start, but I'm not sure if you're > > suggesting > > >> we make the mesos org the home for the community frameworks/modules, > or > > >> that we will maintain forks of those frameworks and modules in the > mesos > > >> org. > > >> > > >> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Dave Lester <daveles...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Hi All, > > >>> > > >>> To push forward one portion of the conversation re: Mesos extension > > >>> hosting > > >>> and a shared registry (MESOS-1759 > > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1759>), I'd like to > > suggest > > >>> that we begin using the existing Mesos GitHub org ( > > >>> https://github.com/mesos/) > > >>> for community frameworks and modules. This is already happening in > > >>> practice > > >>> (see: mesos-go bindings, storm, hadoop + others already w/in the > org), > > >>> however I don't think this has explicitly been called out as an > > >>> opportunity > > >>> for folks to use. > > >>> > > >>> IMHO, opening this up to all is a good idea. I'd also recommend > > >>> explicitly > > >>> calling out the fact that while these projects are w/in the Mesos org > > on > > >>> GH, they are not explicitly Apache projects. Any objections or > > >>> suggestions? > > >>> > > >>> If this sounds good, I can add related documentation. > > >>> > > >>> Dave > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Dominic Hamon | @mrdo | Twitter > > >> *There are no bad ideas; only good ideas that go horribly wrong.* > > >> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Dominic Hamon | @mrdo | Twitter > > *There are no bad ideas; only good ideas that go horribly wrong.* > > > > > -- > Cheers, > > Chris Aniszczyk > http://aniszczyk.org > +1 512 961 6719 > -- Dominic Hamon | @mrdo | Twitter *There are no bad ideas; only good ideas that go horribly wrong.*
