> On Jan. 27, 2015, 12:58 a.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote: > > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/net.hpp, line 397 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/29288/diff/9/?file=834346#file834346line397> > > > > Here and below: > > Is the initialization of the members in the constructor scope a style > > choice here for clarity? Why initialize family in the initializer list for > > the default constructor, but not for the other constructors?
no, sorry for that. > On Jan. 27, 2015, 12:58 a.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote: > > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/net.hpp, line 514 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/29288/diff/9/?file=834346#file834346line514> > > > > I'm sorry if I missed something earlier, why is this not being passed > > by constant reference? Same for the function below. sorry for that. > On Jan. 27, 2015, 12:58 a.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote: > > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/net.hpp, lines 520-524 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/29288/diff/9/?file=834346#file834346line520> > > > > If you provide a name for this union, then everywhere that you memset / > > memcpy and take sizeof(in6Addr_), as well as everywhere that you take the > > address of it, you can replace these with the name of the union. > > > > This is more resilient to change, and removes the implicit knowledge > > that we're picking on this element in the union because we know it to be > > the largest one. named it InternetAddressStorage. - Evelina ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29288/#review69713 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Jan. 27, 2015, 4:58 p.m., Evelina Dumitrescu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/29288/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 27, 2015, 4:58 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Dominic Hamon, Jie Yu, Joris Van > Remoortere, and Niklas Nielsen. > > > Bugs: MESOS-1919 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1919 > > > Repository: mesos-git > > > Description > ------- > > Created the inner class InAddrStorage encapsulated inside the IP class. > The class uses a union with the in_addr and in6_addr fields. > I considered that the The MasterInfo protobuffers should have both an ipv4 > and an ipv6 field. > I intend to use the same Classifiers, addition, removal and update of > container filters, but write different encode/decode functions for IPv4/ICMP > and IPv6/ICMPv6 because the processing of the protocol headers differ. > > > Diffs > ----- > > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/net.hpp > a0210ea6440086246aafe632f86498abbb70719a > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/net_tests.cpp > 425132e5d7c3770be4a5a39feea5a2f22179b871 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29288/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Evelina Dumitrescu > >
