----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30873/ -----------------------------------------------------------
(Updated Feb. 12, 2015, 1:33 a.m.) Review request for mesos. Repository: mesos Description (updated) ------- ## Overview We'll shortly be allowing operators to dynamically change the reservation configurations of slaves as well. At which point the words `STATIC` and `DYNAMIC` are no longer accurate since the `STATIC` reservations would also be dynamic. We change the terminology here to indicate the source of the reservation, the reserver. ## Changes * `ReservationType` => `ReserverType` * `STATIC` => `SLAVE` * `DYNAMIC` => `FRAMEWORK` ## Remark 1. In `ReserverType`, 0 and 2 are left out for `NONE=0` and `OPERATOR=2` which we plan to introduce later on. 2. This is marked WIP (Work in Progress) since the design of this hasn't been fully approved yet. This chain of review requests are essentially a prototype. Diffs ----- include/mesos/mesos.proto 3a2921dff856d37455593dcbf7340aa537997d35 src/master/allocator.hpp 2149ea48dd8614dc29350efaddcb43b6a082a43e src/master/master.hpp 6a39df04514c756415354fae66c5835ada191c52 src/messages/messages.proto 55b3a24ed05c04eaafc27243477bfc778a72b1d4 src/slave/slave.cpp f39a876cdd6b580a7a75fd053e6923761bee7635 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30873/diff/ Testing ------- make check Thanks, Michael Park
