----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30873/ -----------------------------------------------------------
(Updated Feb. 14, 2015, 12:28 a.m.) Review request for mesos. Repository: mesos Description ------- ## Overview We'll shortly be allowing operators to dynamically change the reservation configurations of slaves as well. At which point the words `STATIC` and `DYNAMIC` are no longer accurate since the `STATIC` reservations would also be dynamic. We change the terminology here to indicate the source of the reservation, the reserver. ## Changes * `ReservationType` => `ReserverType` * `STATIC` => `SLAVE` * `DYNAMIC` => `FRAMEWORK` ## Remark 1. In `ReserverType`, 0 and 2 are left out for `NONE=0` and `OPERATOR=2` which we plan to introduce later on. 2. This is marked WIP (Work in Progress) since the design of this hasn't been fully approved yet. This chain of review requests are essentially a prototype. Diffs (updated) ----- include/mesos/mesos.proto 6ece3ea30f9689db435b330422f8dfc08816316a src/master/allocator/allocator.hpp c2461a32e18dbafe637f37180f86bfa2e1d78735 src/master/master.hpp 6a39df04514c756415354fae66c5835ada191c52 src/messages/messages.proto 58484ae45071a80afd2b11803dd66a88f88ad9ed src/slave/slave.cpp ec7ec1356e745bb07484ae1755c9183b038043b3 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30873/diff/ Testing ------- make check Thanks, Michael Park
